aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/infra/libkookie/nixpkgs/pkgs/development/python-modules/cryptography/CVE-2020-25659.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'infra/libkookie/nixpkgs/pkgs/development/python-modules/cryptography/CVE-2020-25659.patch')
-rw-r--r--infra/libkookie/nixpkgs/pkgs/development/python-modules/cryptography/CVE-2020-25659.patch76
1 files changed, 76 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/infra/libkookie/nixpkgs/pkgs/development/python-modules/cryptography/CVE-2020-25659.patch b/infra/libkookie/nixpkgs/pkgs/development/python-modules/cryptography/CVE-2020-25659.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a353757be11f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/infra/libkookie/nixpkgs/pkgs/development/python-modules/cryptography/CVE-2020-25659.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+Backported of:
+
+From 58494b41d6ecb0f56b7c5f05d5f5e3ca0320d494 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>
+Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 21:16:42 -0400
+Subject: [PATCH] Attempt to mitigate Bleichenbacher attacks on RSA decryption
+ (#5507)
+
+diff --git a/docs/spelling_wordlist.txt b/docs/spelling_wordlist.txt
+index 6e4675d..ce66c28 100644
+--- a/docs/spelling_wordlist.txt
++++ b/docs/spelling_wordlist.txt
+@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ backend
+ Backends
+ backends
+ bcrypt
++Bleichenbacher
+ Blowfish
+ boolean
+ Botan
+diff --git a/src/cryptography/hazmat/backends/openssl/rsa.py b/src/cryptography/hazmat/backends/openssl/rsa.py
+index 3e4c2fd..6303f95 100644
+--- a/src/cryptography/hazmat/backends/openssl/rsa.py
++++ b/src/cryptography/hazmat/backends/openssl/rsa.py
+@@ -117,40 +117,19 @@ def _enc_dec_rsa_pkey_ctx(backend, key, data, padding_enum, padding):
+
+ outlen = backend._ffi.new("size_t *", buf_size)
+ buf = backend._ffi.new("unsigned char[]", buf_size)
++ # Everything from this line onwards is written with the goal of being as
++ # constant-time as is practical given the constraints of Python and our
++ # API. See Bleichenbacher's '98 attack on RSA, and its many many variants.
++ # As such, you should not attempt to change this (particularly to "clean it
++ # up") without understanding why it was written this way (see
++ # Chesterton's Fence), and without measuring to verify you have not
++ # introduced observable time differences.
+ res = crypt(pkey_ctx, buf, outlen, data, len(data))
++ resbuf = backend._ffi.buffer(buf)[: outlen[0]]
++ backend._lib.ERR_clear_error()
+ if res <= 0:
+- _handle_rsa_enc_dec_error(backend, key)
+-
+- return backend._ffi.buffer(buf)[:outlen[0]]
+-
+-
+-def _handle_rsa_enc_dec_error(backend, key):
+- errors = backend._consume_errors()
+- backend.openssl_assert(errors)
+- backend.openssl_assert(errors[0].lib == backend._lib.ERR_LIB_RSA)
+- if isinstance(key, _RSAPublicKey):
+- backend.openssl_assert(
+- errors[0].reason == backend._lib.RSA_R_DATA_TOO_LARGE_FOR_KEY_SIZE
+- )
+- raise ValueError(
+- "Data too long for key size. Encrypt less data or use a "
+- "larger key size."
+- )
+- else:
+- decoding_errors = [
+- backend._lib.RSA_R_BLOCK_TYPE_IS_NOT_01,
+- backend._lib.RSA_R_BLOCK_TYPE_IS_NOT_02,
+- backend._lib.RSA_R_OAEP_DECODING_ERROR,
+- # Though this error looks similar to the
+- # RSA_R_DATA_TOO_LARGE_FOR_KEY_SIZE, this occurs on decrypts,
+- # rather than on encrypts
+- backend._lib.RSA_R_DATA_TOO_LARGE_FOR_MODULUS,
+- ]
+- if backend._lib.Cryptography_HAS_RSA_R_PKCS_DECODING_ERROR:
+- decoding_errors.append(backend._lib.RSA_R_PKCS_DECODING_ERROR)
+-
+- backend.openssl_assert(errors[0].reason in decoding_errors)
+- raise ValueError("Decryption failed.")
++ raise ValueError("Encryption/decryption failed.")
++ return resbuf
+
+
+ def _rsa_sig_determine_padding(backend, key, padding, algorithm):